Kodexa Luau Benchmarks
Comparing 18 AI models across 21 Luau coding tasks on accuracy, cost, and speed.
Models
18
Top Score
99.1%
Cursor Grok 4.6
Speed Leader
96.9% @ 02:04
mimo-v2.5-pro (#3)
Fastest
01:57
gpt-oss-20b
Lowest Cost
$0.006
gpt-oss-20b
Note: These results are based on our proprietary benchmark suite, which is actively evolving with more difficult, real-world Luau engineering tasks and improved scoring reliability. Actual performance may vary depending on your specific codebase, prompts, and runtime environment.
95% – 100% Score
5 Models
90% – 95% Score
3 Models
Below 90% Score
10 Models
Key takeaway:
mimo-v2.5-pro achieved #3 overall (96.9%) in 02:04 for only $0.0136.
| Rank | Model | Score (%) | Cost (21 tasks) | Time | Score / $ | Action |
|---|
Metric Differences
Radar Profile
Monthly Task Volume
Presets:
Estimated Monthly Cost & Time
Overview & Disclaimer
Luau is a typed scripting language derived from Lua 5.1, widely used in game engines and simulation systems. Most LLMs struggle with Luau because of its strict type checker, custom metamethods, and memory buffer operations.
Disclaimer: This is based on our own benchmark suite, which is continually improving and becoming more reliable with additional, more difficult, and real-world Luau tasks. Real-world usage and practical performance may differ depending on your codebase, prompt structure, and execution environment.
Strict Typing: Luau type packs, singleton types, and non-nil narrowing.
Metatables: Metamethod protocols (
__iter, __len, __mode).
Memory Buffers: SIMD vector operations and direct buffer manipulations.
Test Setup
All models were evaluated using the same prompt template at temperature 0.0:
Environment
Luau 0.6x Strict Mode
Suite Size
21 Standardized Tasks
Grading
Type Check + Unit Tests
Metrics
Cost ($), Score (%), Time (s)